8. Family and identical twin study
The Global Model has consolidated and improved the excellent results of the Social Model, both in terms of the transmission of intelligence from one generation to another and the existence of the LoVeInf method with the concentration of intelligence genes in one chromosome.
It has also confirmed the ability of the Conditional Evolution of Life (CEL) to generate sets of vectors of intelligence quotients W° that behave like the observed ones, which again settles that the related genes are on the sex-linked chromosome.
8 - Family - Identical twin study
|Evolution with CI Mothers||Adjustment for Globus Model|
|q082°||Siblings or dizygotic twins|
|Clons Replica q053 °|
Clons Replica q056 °
|(1 Mothers q085)
(2 Mothers q086°)
|Progenitors||Rearrangement criteria M and evolution|
|(3 Fathers q087)
(4 Fathers q088°)
|Rearrangement criteria F and evolution|
|q089°||Sexual selection - Couples||Without sexual selection (q063°)|
With - Sexy Globus Model
This section includes, on the one hand, the correlation and multiple regression graphs of the Global Model on the adjustment of the evolution with increases in the intelligence coefficients of the mothers and the hypothesis of sexual selection; both already explained and used previously for the representation of the Globus Model and Sexy Globus Model respectively.
On the other hand, some curiosities of cases for a better understanding of both biological and statistical models of sex-linked genes and chromosomes within an approach to family and intelligence.
Specifically, the correlation and multiple regression graphs in this section refer to:
Sensitivity analysis of internal evolution parameters
The theoretical model of the CEL shows that there is the evolution of intelligence with environmental influences, but in a general way, that is, the capacity increases throughout life and transmits to the offspring through genes and chromosomes linked to sex.
It also indicates that internal evolution will only occur in male genes because they are continually renewing in nature, while female eggs do not differ from very early stages.
The method compares the Sexy Globus Model results of only female intelligence evolution with the results without any improvement, and with exclusive intelligence male change. The vast correlations and regression graphs the model represents visually can be seen in the following graphs q173 ° and q176 °, which speak for themselves.
The CEL and the Global Cognitive Theory explains in detail the primary arguments that nullify any sexist interpretation of the results, given the different biological functions of men and women.
Intelligence in twins, brothers, and clones
The similarity of the variables H in the graph q081 could correspond to the IQ of identical twins while the W° would be only normal brothers since it comes from the data of the same fathers and mothers.
This behavior is repeated on numerous occasions when the sort order is one of the variables H –children of the families.
Dizygotic brothers or twins
In the graph q082 ° the statistical ordering criterion is W°, and the behavior is somewhat different, it seems that the four variables of IQ correspond to identical twins of the same families. However, it is just a case.
Another example of application may be that different intelligence tests detect different types of human brain functions that make up relational intelligence.
The correlation and multiple regression graphs q083 ° and q084 ° clearly show how W° can resemble one or another variable H depending on the randomness involved in the Mendelian genetic combination of chromosomes of both sexes. The comment will be entirely understood comparing the images q053 and q056, respectively.
All variables H correspond to a mono-environmental monozygotic twin. While W° will be just a brother, and because of that, sometimes it will look alike and sometimes not so much.
It is not difficult to imagine some new and exciting studies on these peculiar characteristics of the sex-linked genes and chromosomes of intelligence with a family approach coefficient.
Asymmetric behavior of the mothers M and fathers F vectors
Now, the behavior for R of the same centered variables is more precise when ordering the data in two other forms, that is, M and F, both with and without evolution.
The correlations obtained are quite low because M and F are not very good as management criteria and go down even more when introducing evolution.
The exciting facet is to observe the differences between the two variables of the parents. F is a better sorting criterion than M, and its correlation with R is also higher. However, with evolution, the correlation of F with R ° lowers, and that of M goes up.
Regardless of the quantity, it looks like the drawn curves are from mirror images.
Other curiosities are the difference in the behavior of W° and its variation to the parents M and F as statistical ordering criteria.
Intelligence in sexual or couple selection
Due to the relevance of the subject, the confirmed hypothesis about sexual selection and intelligence is summarized here. Besides, to remark that the concentration of genes related to intelligence in the sex-linked chromosome allows the validation of the hypothesis of sexual selection.
Regarding the possibility of establishing some additional hypotheses to the Global and Globus models to improve their goodness-of-fit, the EDI Study incorporates the relevance of the difference in intelligence between the father and the mother as conditioning for the effective initial acceptance of the couple's configuration.
The additional hypothesis introduced in the model is to establish as the limit in the difference in intelligence that:
“The most potent chromosome of one of the couple's members has to be at least as powerful as the least potent chromosome of the other and vice versa.”
In the generation of the new values, only ten of the seventy IQs of the R ° function have been affected by more than two percent of their value. The vector W°° is also affected by the new condition imposed on the couple selection.
The model improves to some extent with the individual variables, but the effect is much more noticeable with the centered variables. The GMCI, with the sorting criteria * M1P1 °, goes from 15.61 to 17 and the maximum r² from 0.89 to 0.97 for the objective function R ° ° (see graph q063)
For the objective function M & P, the GMCI stands at 17.62 when it was previously at 17.77, and the maximum r² also rises from 0.89 to 0.97. As usual, the maximum values of r² correspond to the variable X6 –the average of 6 variables of the children.
The correlation and multiple regression graph of the Sexy Globus Model collecting visually these values is undoubtedly impressive, see graph q077 °