2.d) Emotional intelligence
One expression with popular success in recent years in the field of cerebral capacities is emotional intelligence from Daniel Goleman’s book published in 1995. Let us analyze the concept of emotional intelligence from various perspectives.
It is worth mentioning that if there were problems in the definition and acceptance of the concept of intelligence, the concept of emotional intelligence is even more confusing, since adding the adjective emotional makes it, at least, partially contradictory to the first.
There have always been attempts to take away importance or relevance from the characteristic of personal intelligence, especially by those who do not have as much of it as they might wish or those who are incapable of recognizing and accepting what they do have due to ideological prejudices.
There always has been a distinction between being intelligent and clever with the same inspiration that represents the expression of emotional intelligence.
Some concepts can be useful and descriptive of reality or ideas, but in the case of Daniel Goleman, the chosen terminology seems more like an attempt to change the meaning of the word intelligence or to represent something that does not correspond with the given content. The adjective emotional is different and even contradictory to logic or reasoning.
Daniel Goleman’s concept or definition of emotional intelligence uses words with diffuse or diverse meanings like intelligence, control, emotion, feelings, social success, personal well-being.
We have the impression that practically everyone can think of and assume a concept appropriate to their socio-personal reality.
If we had to express the concept of emotional intelligence in just one word it would be worddology.
Of course, those who champion the concept would develop a concept more in line with social intelligence; we would agree with this if the terminology did not have such strong connotations because when speaking of emotions the expression’s intention is essential.
There is not any! Trying to evaluate social success objectively or valuing the adequacy of interpersonal relationships or emotional well-being is like imposing an objective scale on personal happiness.
Apparently, in extreme cases of depression or other types of personal problems, one can try to make some objective scale, but it will always be in general terms such as normal, slight or severe. Of course, they would not be appropriate for emotional intelligence.
Biology of emotions
The Global Cognitive Theory dedicates a chapter to emotions in the book on willpower. In particular, emotions are unlike feelings, which are on a more spiritual level to avoid complicating an already tricky issue.
Emotions are described as the body’s automatic reactions as much in a cognitive sense as purely physiological or non-cognitive. In this sense, emotions are like programs of immediate action which have been created throughout the whole life and form part of a person’s character. We imagine that each person creates these automatic response programs in the best way they can, using the cognitive instruments that they possess.
Emotions exist because it would not be possible to examine complex situations that require quick response or it would not be efficient for repetitive situations; therefore, they are automated in both cases. Expecting to control emotions would mean giving up our brain’s and body’s elegant design, which is impossible as the majority of these actions are inherent.
Socially the concept of emotional intelligence is enough to promote the working spirit of citizens. Neither would it look lovely, from a political point of view, to point out possible genetic differences in intellectual abilities.
The media in general and magazines about the brain are happy to include articles that comment positively on the modern concept of emotional intelligence.
Also, numerous freelance professionals happily and enthusiastically take on Daniel Goleman´s emotional intelligence and the possibility of self-improvement, while saying they have a special gift and that they are naturally experts regarding emotional intelligence.
The big advantage of emotional intelligence is that it allows each person to become intelligent, and even more so if on top of that they are also emotionally intelligent. This perspective increases self-esteem when believing that those who are intelligence in a strict sense do not appropriately manage emotional intelligence.
It makes sense that the less intelligent someone is in a strict sense, the more likely they are to accept the new concept. Likewise, this effect is more significant if a person does not have much self-esteem regarding the intelligence.
Indeed, there are some signs that, when characterizing people with the word “intelligence” in this new context, it is independent of whether or not they are intelligent in the strict sense. Moreover, in the majority of cases, this expression tries to diminish the importance of classical intelligence.
There could exist cases where the acceptance of the new expression is related to feelings like arrogance, envy, personal complexes or economic interests.
To summarize, We think that a real and useful concept behind emotional intelligence exists, in line with social intelligence, but the expression is unfortunate, changing the concept, so it becomes something entirely negative.
We consider the concept of elegant intelligence to be much more pleasant and real. It would allow being proud of our intelligence regardless of the quantitative aspect and comparisons because, in short, the logic of evolution of life leads to quite a pyramid of development stages in constructing intelligence as a group of elemental and multifaceted abilities.
Thanks and respect to all the living beings that have made and continue making the current world possible.